Pluto connects what's happening in your business to what your numbers do next, and shows its working. The insight your best analyst carries in their head, made explicit, auditable, and built into every forecast.
Built by a practising FP&A professional, for the commercial teams shaping the first release.
ERPs reconcile the numbers. Analysts supply the story. Nothing connects the two, so the reasoning behind every forecast stays intuitive, unwritten, and impossible to hand over.
Your best analyst feels which drivers move the P&L. That judgment never leaves their notebook, or their head.
When the CFO asks "why has the forecast moved?", the honest answer is a story, not a traceable line from cause to effect.
The day that analyst walks out, years of hard-won commercial intuition walk out with them. Nothing transferable is left behind.
Upload a CSV of your actuals and connect Pluto's external driver library: CPI, rates, FX, commodities, weather.
Pluto ranks which drivers genuinely move each line (leading, lagging, or just noise) and flags the traps.
Walk-forward backtesting checks the model against history it never saw, with a plain-English verdict, not a black box.
A board-ready narrative comes attached to every number. The explanation is built in, ready to present.
The largest review of modern forecasting finds that structured human judgment consistently improves accuracy, and that human-guided variable selection beats automated approaches when real domain knowledge is present.Petropoulos et al. (2022) · International Journal of Forecasting
That's the whole idea behind Pluto: put the analyst's judgment and the machine's rigour in one loop, and you beat either on its own.
How information is represented changes how well people reason with it. Pluto makes the drivers legible, so your judgment has something to grip.
Experts steering a model as it learns outperform hands-off automation. Pluto is built around that loop, not around replacing it.
Accuracy only counts on data the model never saw. Pluto backtests walk-forward, so it never grades itself on the answers.
Every number is traceable to the drivers behind it. Reforecast across quarters, a year, or a five-year plan, and see exactly what's carrying it.
Backtest: within 3.2% across the last 6 windows. Reliable to plan on.
Styx explains what moved, drafts the commentary, and suggests drivers worth testing. The boring work, done. Ask it in plain language or reach for a command.
A forecasting tool for a finance audience has to earn trust before it earns a number. So here's where we draw the line.
Pluto surfaces the drivers that matter most, not an exhaustive attribution of every cent.
The output is fertile ground for a strategic conversation, not the final word. You bring the context only you have; Pluto does the rest.
We're working with a small group of commercial teams ahead of launch. Tell us what you forecast, and we'll show you how Pluto handles it.